Photographic Restoration, Retouching and Modification Services

NOTE - Please read this regarding the controversy of digital image manipulation

 

Do you have a tattered, faded old photograph that you would like to see restored to its original state?

Do any of your photos have undesirable background subjects that "upstage" or detract from the main subject?

Recent advances in software technology have allowed the photographer to achieve truly miraculous results in the restoration and manipulation of photographs. Damaged photos that were once considered unsalvageable can now be given a new lease on life in the "digital darkroom", and undesirable backgrounds and subject items can often be deleted out of frame.

Many image manipulation programs come with automatic restoration features such as "red eye removal" built in. While these automated applications can do certain tasks acceptably, other more advanced restoration techniques require the careful eye and skilled expertise of a photographer. Like an artist's paintbrush, merely possessing the tools does not mean anyone can create a Michelangelo! Experience can and does make all the difference, and that is where I come "into frame" for you.

I first started doing image restoration and manipulation over 11 years ago. In that time span, I have honed my very own techniques that can often achieve incredible results. I am quite proud of my work and will let it speak for itself.  Below are several examples of my work in image manipulation and restoration. 

As you look at these sample images toggle "before and after", examine them carefully for tell-tale signs the image has been manipulated. I think you will appreciate the fact that even when looking for clues that the image has been altered, that it is often difficult if not impossible to spot restoration "artifacts" in my work - even when actively looking for them...

 

The black and white baby images you see above were photos of a clients mother as a child; her only photos of herself from that era.  My client presented them to her mother in frames as a 50'th wedding anniversary gift.  She said her mother was "moved to tears" when she tore back the wrapping paper.  Not only had her childhood memories been recovered and preserved for the ages, but she was thrilled to have 5x7 enlargements of these photos - where the originals were only 2x3 "wallet size" prints.
 

Now that you have seen the images toggle "before and after", you know their secrets. So step back and cast an impartial eye to my work. Imagine yourself the casual viewer of one of these retouched images - someone who is unaware the image has been manipulated in any way. Even when actively looking for imperfections, you'll find they are often difficult if not impossible to spot. In that regard I believe that someone who is NOT looking over the image for signs it has been manipulated, will in all likelihood never know it has been altered.

Pricing

As it is impossible to know how many hours of restoration work must be applied to a particular image without seeing the image first, I ask that you send a scanned image to me
restorations @ patrick-burns.net Once I have reviewed the image, I can get a better estimate of the time required and will send you a free quote.


Controversy and Skepticism

As a photographer and paranormal investigator who not only confesses to, but actively solicits his advanced image manipulation skills, some will no doubt question the validity of still images I present as evidence of the paranormal. Knowing I possess these advanced skills, this is of course an honest, and very valid question to ask.

Note that I have presented images that have been "enhanced" from my investigations; however this is limited to enhancing the brightness/contrast ratios and/or gamma levels in a photo. I do this to bring out more faint anomalies in photos that would otherwise not be visible. I do however always retain the untouched, original images for comparison purposes. I do not "add" extra subjects into my paranormal photos, and I have not and will never fraudulently manipulate a photo which I present as evidence, nor will I knowingly manipulate an image for an outside party to present as evidence.

Some believe that one of the downfalls of digital images is that you cannot tell a digital image has been altered, and this is NOT TRUE. Tampering with images usually leaves subtle tell-tale signs that the file has been altered. Signs that an experienced digital photographer can spot. Those who know me personally will attest that I care too much about our field to ever "manufacture" evidence of the paranormal, and even if I didn't have the moral and ethical aversion to such fraud, it would likely be caught by someone with a skilled eye.